Image source: Singapore Supreme Court

The courts of Singapore and China have jointly published a collection of international commercial cases from both countries to symbolise their deep commitment in the pursuit of mutual understanding of each other’s laws and legal systems.

Titled ‘A Compendium of Singapore–China International Commercial Cases Curated for their Relevance to the Belt and Road Initiative‘, the book was launched by Singapore’s Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon and President & Chief Justice of China’s court Zhou Qiang during the 4th Singapore-China Legal and Judicial Roundtable which was held virtually on Monday (30 Nov).

According to Singapore’s Supreme Court in a statement yesterday, the Compendium – which are relevant to China’s Belt and Road Initiative – is the culmination of a dedicated team effort by a panel of editors as well as expert commentators from Singapore and China, coordinated by the Singapore Judicial College and the China National Judges College.

“There are also plans to make this available in the public domain as an invaluable introduction to learn more about, and to explore the commonalities between the commercial laws of Singapore and China,” the statement read.

During the Roundtable session yesterday, both countries renewed their commitment to work together to advance access to justice in their respective jurisdictions amid the challenging circumstances caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

“The Roundtable kicked off with a bilateral meeting during which the two Chief Justices had a frank and constructive discussion to deepen existing joint initiatives and explore new areas of cooperation in areas of mutual interest,” said Singapore’s Supreme Court.

Both judges also exchanged insights in various areas, such as the challenges posed to the courts and the profession brought by COVID-19, how to unify the legal application standards through similar cases and precedents, the application and limitation of general legal principles in international commercial disputes, as well as the court procedural rules relevant to BRI.

Subscribe
Notify of
5 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

China’s Ba Yi aerobatics team cleared by MINDEF to participate in Singapore Airshow 2020

In the flurry of ramped up health screenings at entry points and…

Dae Sung Construction fined $42,000 for damaging water main

A construction company was fined S$42,000 earlier on 2 April 2019 for…

狮城、日、港干案 劫15万元名表小偷台湾落网

涉嫌于去年6月偷走15万元劳力士名表的男子,原来是国际匪徒,被揭发曾在日本和香港干案,日前于台中落网。 男子于去年6月12日,身穿黑蓝色T恤到HJ Luxury手表店,趁着柜台小姐展示和讲解手表时,一手夺过两只总值15万元的二手镶钻劳力士表后,就转身逃跑。女店员和其他商家虽然纷纷追赶,却还是让他成功逃脱。警方在接获报案后,也发布了嫌犯的正面照片,进行全岛通缉。 然而,据台湾《世界日报》报导指出,这名男子已经于去年11月,在台中被逮捕。 这名30岁的台湾男子林汤骏已经于上周五(17日),在台中地检署以加重强盗罪起诉,被告也被转移至审法院裁定和续押。 据报导,去年5月23日,被告曾在日本一家手表店内盗窃。 被告被指于去年10月5日中午,曾在香港旺角的模型枪店内购买了一把仿真空气枪后,于隔日带着“枪支”到尖沙咀的经典时计钟表行内,打算故技重施偷表。 然而被告在店内无机可乘,就使用仿真枪威胁男店员并互相拉扯,被告最终成功劫走两支总值约99万港元(约17万新元)的劳力士表。 被告随后成功飞回台湾,基于港台之间没有司法合作管道,因此香港警方无法进行调查和逮捕。 此抢劫案也被称为台湾版陈同佳案。 港警随后于去年11月5日致函台湾刑事局,向他们请求帮助逮捕被告。台湾警方于同个月份,顺藤摸瓜,在台中将被告逮捕,并在被告和女友的住家中,搜获各种赃物,包括四支劳力士表、Prada等各式名牌包包、Tiffany项链和玉佩等,及超过270万新台币(约12万新元)的赃款。 台中地检署指出,基于被告在各地所犯下的案件纯属偷窃案件,并未涉及其他更重罪刑的强盗事件,而且发生在境外,台湾无权审判,导致相关的起诉无效,因此被告可能只面对最轻本刑三年以下的徒刑。

选举局:总统选委会不筛选总统候选人选

本月13日,《海峡时报》评论编辑蔡美芬(Chua Mui Hoong)发表一篇评论:《行动党和支配政治》,抨击执政政府有意在政治和学术圈维持支配地位,惟必须当心因为过于蛮横,而被视为随时准备打压异议者的支配政党。 她先是非议此前教育部长王乙康,在国会上针对剧作家亚菲言的言论,指出副总理王瑞杰声称“要谦逊聆听和尊重国人的观点”,一同建设更好的新加坡,言犹在耳,而王乙康的做法,又是否代表整个政府领导层的立场? 他也认为实则耶鲁-国立大学学院异议课程被腰斩的事件,不过反映了政府近期对于异议采取更为严厉的手段,例如通过《防假消息法》;历史学者覃炳鑫,指行动党政府在1963年假借国安为由,以“冷藏行动”对付异议者,结果遭到“审问”和穷追猛打。 她认为这些都是人民行动党在公开场合彰显自己支配地位的例子,它的力量几乎延伸至生活各个层面;在国会中掌控83个多数议席;至于总统虽是直接选举产生,但政府仍能通过总统选举委员会,在筛选候选人人选时产生影响。 选举局反驳总统选委会不筛选候选人 不过,选举局高级副总监Tay Chai Luan,在本月19日在《海时》反驳,有关蔡美芬指“总统选举委会对候选人筛选能产生影响”一说有误,并解释该委会从未筛选候选人选,仅依据宪法指定的条件,确保候选人符合参选资格,无权阻止任何合格人士参选。 “总统选举委会(PEC)是独立机构,其组成规定也列在宪法中。由公共服务委员会主席担任主席,成员包括新加坡会计与企业管理局主管、少数种族权利总统理事会主席委任的四位成员、总统顾问理事会主席、大法官和总理等。” 在2017年的总统选举,总统选举委会成员分别是:…