It was reported earlier today (30 Oct) that Robinsons Singapore, one of the oldest stores in the Lion City having been in business for more than 160 years, will be closing down for good after suffering from losses in recent years amid dwindling revenues.

However, its last two department stores at The Heeren and Raffles City Shopping Centre will remain operational for a while more for final sales.

Following this announcement, People’s Voice (PV) chief Lim Tean took to his Facebook expressing that the closure of the beloved franchise marks a “sad chapter” in Singapore’s social history.

“I recall that in my childhood days, my Mother would often tell me that Robinsons was synonymous with quality, and we would make the extra effort to buy from there for special occasions,” he wrote.

According to Mr Lim, Robinsons’ closure offers an “important lesson” in how Singaporeans should view the development of the country in the coming post-COVID era.

The party chief asserted that it will be “foolhardy” to follow the paths laid down by the People’s Action Party (PAP) leaders – who are hinting that Singaporeans “must go back to the norms of the past as quickly as possible”.

“What they are hoping for – such as Singapore re-emerging as an air hub or our port remaining the pre-eminent transhipment hub – may not be possible in the coming years. COVID has created a new world, and it is a world where re-imagining ourselves and creativity is going to be far more important than anything else in ensuring our continued prosperity,” he remarked.

Mr Lim went on to say that Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and his ministers love to mouth words like ‘re-inventing‘ and ‘transformation‘ on a regular basis; but in reality, he argued that the PAP are “anathema to change in any meaningful way”.

“In the coming years, it will be seen that the draconian social structures they have imposed on our society in the last 6 decades in order to maintain absolute rule will turn out to be nothing more than a mirage and aberration,” he concluded.

Subscribe
Notify of
68 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Netizens feel SingPost needs to buck up their mail delivery services

On 2 January, The Straits Times (ST) published a complaint letter by…

PSP’s Kumaran Pillai mistaken for an expat by financial consultant on LinkedIn

For a prominent figure in the media industry who has been living…

Heng: Perception of rising cost of living due to changing aspirations and consumption patterns

According to an ST report today (‘Budget addresses cost of living concerns,…

三度非礼女子大腿 男“成绩好”仅判缓刑 尚穆根对判决“感惊讶”

日前,涉及在在地铁站和车厢内三度非礼女性大腿和臀部的一名国大生,法官鉴于男子成绩好,且“所犯的罪属轻微”,判他缓刑监视21个月。 控方之前要求法官判被告入狱六周,即一个月半,但是法官基于被告成绩良好,因此判他缓刑监视21个月,必须自晚上11时至隔日早上6时都待在家中,而且还要执行150个小时的社区服务,并且结束治疗。 不过,这项判决反而让舆论在网络上炸开了锅,有者认为学优和他涉及违法,是两回事,法律前应人人平等;有者联想到此前闹得沸沸扬扬的国大偷拍事件,国大对涉事者惩处方式被斥责荒谬。 对于昨日非礼案的判决,内政暨律政部长尚穆根在脸书发文指出,自己也对判决“感到惊讶”。 检察署打算上诉 他表示,自己可以理解受害者和他父母的感受,也受到他父亲的信。对此他也征询总检察署意见,后者告知他总检察署不同意判决并打算上诉,“这也符合我的观点。” 他说,人们可以针对判决或觉得不公,表达他们的观点、不满;不过,他又提醒,尽管人们对于此事感到愤慨,不过法官乃是履行职责,应避免人身攻击法官。目前只能等候上诉庭来审理此时。 “如果上诉庭也裁决了,但是社会群众仍相信法律上应带来不同的结果,那么已不是法庭的错。” 那么到时将是由国会处理、修法或立法,而政府将提案到国会进行检讨。 不过,也有网民质疑,当尚穆根公开对案件发表评述时,是否也形同在让法官感到舆论压力? “藐视法庭”,恐惹祸上身 不过,尚穆根也提出了大家不容忽视的重点,即尽管大家对法官判决无法沟通,但是评论裁决,也可能惹来“藐视法庭”的罪名。…